🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation from Clearing House over Seized Assets The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming damages totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a direct response by the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. EU leaders will determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. Divergent Legal Views European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan. Geopolitical Maneuvering In comments interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States." Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although judges in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched. Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing war. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."