🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has joined the growing list of performers who voice skepticism about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, revealing she opted against their services while filming her latest project her upcoming film.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

Intimacy coordinators emerged following the #MeToo era to guarantee the security and comfort of actors during sequences involving nudity and intimate moments. Yet, numerous prominent performers including Jennifer Aniston and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their presence, with some claiming they interfere with creative flow.

Jennifer's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her latest project where she portrays a character descending into postpartum disturbance, the actress commented: "We did not have such a professional, or perhaps we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She continued: "He is completely professional and very committed to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly focused on family life and relationships. There was never awkward tension or doubts about professional limits."

"Had there been even a hint of discomfort, I would have insisted on an on-set professional. Many male actors get upset if you aren't interested in their advances, and subsequently the negative treatment begins. He was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, together with multiple additional professional roles including dance direction, craft services, and puppet operation. Previously, they were grouped under "additional crew" instead of having their own designation.

Notwithstanding this validation, these professionals still encounter media scrutiny implying they might not be required standards, with high-profile performers declining their participation. Lawrence's perspective mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who previously shared she refused intimacy coordination while working with Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"Jon was extremely respectful – truly every move, between takes, 'Are you OK?" she recalled. "The scenes were also very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, suitable lighting. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had our director on set."

Other Examples and Professional Response

Although including multiple sequences of sexual activity and regular undress, the award-winning film – the director's Oscar-winning project about a adult entertainer and a Russian oligarch's son – proceeded without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star stated she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be best to keep it small."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had researched Sean's films and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as professional work."

Her comments provoked significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who recently revealed that working on her new movie Marty Supreme marked her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about comfort level with a particular action alongside co-star her younger counterpart, the actress answered: "I'm from the era where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the filming begins."

Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then informed the coordinator: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, extremely restricted by that."

Professional Reaction

After these statements, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick labeled them "concerning" and pointed out that the majority of those opposing intimacy coordinators have established careers to command their own power and security on film sets.

"Periodically an actor shares opinions about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow stated she came of age in a time when industry professionals 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood performing alongside a actor considerably junior than her, although likely he is comfortable, I considered it somewhat concerning remark."

Actor's Viewpoint

Michael Douglas, in contrast, expressed that he believes the primary responsibility during intimate sequences rests with the male performer, instead of a external professional.

"In my experience, you assume duty as the male actor to ensure the female co-star is comfortable, you talk through thoroughly," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance looks like."